Prepare for the Saint Malachy prophecy advocates to go off the hook.
- sonlitknight
- 5 days ago
- 12 min read
Many will deride this post as ill-timed, and they are probably right. However, I can see this coming from a mile away and I just had to get out in front of it.
For decades I have heard of the so-called prophecy of St. Malachy.
Generally looked upon by those in the know, as a forgery and dismissed as unreliable, some Catholics still hold a strange fascination that the end-times will be heralded by the elevation of a final Pope who will be known as Peter the Roman.
Enter Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State. If there were a papal betting market, he would be the prohibitive favorite to be the next elected Pope. Pietro, of course, is Italian for Peter and, if elected, Parolin would be the first Italian Pope elected since John Paul I in 1978.
Cardinal Pietro Parolin, born January 17, 1955, in Schiavon, Italy, is widely regarded as a leading candidate to succeed Pope Francis due to his prominent role as Vatican Secretary of State, extensive diplomatic experience, and moderate ideological stance. Below is a detailed breakdown of his background, career, strengths, challenges, and factors influencing his papabile status, drawing from available sources like Reuters, The Independent, and Vatican profiles.
Background and Personal Details
Age: 70 (as of April 21, 2025), relatively young for a papal candidate, offering the potential for a substantial papacy.
Nationality: Italian, which carries symbolic weight as the Bishop of Rome traditionally hails from Italy, though the last Italian pope was John Paul I (1978).
Education: Holds a degree in theology from the Pontifical Gregorian University and a doctorate in canon law from the same institution. Fluent in Italian, French, Spanish, and English, with working knowledge of other languages.
Ordination: Ordained a priest in 1980 for the Diocese of Vicenza, entering the Vatican’s diplomatic service shortly after.
Career and Key Roles
Early Diplomatic Service:
Joined the Holy See’s diplomatic corps in 1986, serving in nunciatures (Vatican embassies) in Nigeria (1986–1989) and Mexico (1989–1992).
Worked in the Vatican’s Secretariat of State from 1992, handling relations with Spain, Andorra, and Serbia.
Apostolic Nuncio:
Served as Apostolic Nuncio to Venezuela (2009–2013), navigating complex relations during Hugo Chávez’s presidency, showcasing his ability to manage politically sensitive environments.
Vatican Secretary of State:
Appointed by Pope Francis in 2013, becoming the youngest Secretary of State since 1929 at age 58.
Acts as the Vatican’s “prime minister,” overseeing foreign policy, coordinating curial activities, and representing the Holy See globally.
Key achievements include:
Brokering the 2014 U.S.-Cuba diplomatic thaw, earning praise for discreet mediation.
Negotiating the 2018 Vatican-China provisional agreement on bishop appointments, a controversial but historic step toward dialogue with Beijing.
Managing Vatican responses to global crises, including Ukraine, the Middle East, and migration issues.
Cardinal: Elevated to cardinal-priest in 2014, with the titular church of Santi Simone e Giuda Taddeo a Torre Angela.
Other Roles: Member of the Council of Cardinals (advising Francis on governance reforms), the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and other key Vatican bodies, giving him deep insight into Church administration.
Ideological Stance
Moderate Centrist: Parolin is seen as a pragmatic diplomat who balances progressive and conservative elements, aligning broadly with Francis’ vision but avoiding polarizing stances.
On Francis’ Reforms: Supports Francis’ emphasis on synodality (collaborative governance), outreach to marginalized groups, and dialogue with other faiths, but has not publicly championed controversial issues like same-sex blessings or women’s ordination.
Social Issues: Advocates for social justice, climate action, and peace, consistent with Francis’ encyclicals like Laudato Si’ and Fratelli Tutti. He has emphasized diplomacy in addressing global conflicts, such as Ukraine and Gaza.
China Deal: His role in the Vatican-China agreement reflects a willingness to engage pragmatically with contentious issues, though it has drawn criticism from conservatives who view it as compromising Church autonomy.
Traditional Leanings: As an Italian cleric trained in canon law, he respects Church tradition, which reassures conservatives, but his diplomatic focus avoids rigid doctrinal battles.
Strengths as a Papal Candidate
Diplomatic Expertise:
Decades of experience in Vatican diplomacy, from Nigeria to Venezuela to global negotiations, make him adept at navigating geopolitical challenges, a critical skill for a pope in a polarized world.
His role in the U.S.-Cuba deal and Vatican-China agreement demonstrates his ability to achieve results in complex situations.
Vatican Insider:
As Secretary of State, Parolin has intimate knowledge of Vatican operations, curial politics, and global Church dynamics, positioning him to lead effectively from day one.
His involvement in Francis’ reforms (e.g., financial transparency, synodality) aligns him with the current trajectory while maintaining broad appeal.
Italian Heritage:
An Italian pope would resonate with traditionalists and Italians, who make up a significant portion of the College of Cardinals (18 electors, per Reuters). Italy’s historical claim to the papacy (over 200 Italian popes) boosts his appeal.
Moderate Appeal:
His centrist stance bridges progressive cardinals (supporting Francis’ legacy) and conservatives (valuing tradition), making him a consensus candidate in a potentially divided conclave.
Avoids the ideological extremes of figures like Cardinal Raymond Burke (traditionalist) or Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle (progressive).
Age and Health:
At 70, Parolin is young enough for a meaningful papacy (10–20 years) but experienced enough to command respect, a balance cardinals often seek.
No major health issues have been publicly reported, unlike some older candidates.
Global Network:
His diplomatic postings and Vatican role have built relationships with bishops worldwide, potentially securing votes from Europe, Latin America, and beyond.
Challenges and Criticisms
Vatican-China Deal:
The 2018 agreement (renewed in 2020 and 2022) has been criticized by conservatives, notably Cardinal Joseph Zen, for allegedly conceding too much control to Beijing over Chinese Catholics.
This could alienate cardinals who prioritize Church autonomy or view China skeptically, particularly in the U.S. and Europe.
Lack of Pastoral Charisma:
Unlike Tagle or Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, Parolin is seen as a bureaucratic diplomat rather than a charismatic pastor. His reserved demeanor may limit his ability to inspire globally, a key papal trait in the media age.
His limited experience as a diocesan bishop (never led a major archdiocese) may concern cardinals seeking a pope with strong pastoral credentials.
Italian Bias Concerns:
While his Italian roots are a strength, some non-European cardinals (from Asia, Africa, or Latin America) may prefer a pope from the Global South to reflect the Church’s demographic shift (over 60% of Catholics live outside Europe/North America).
The last three popes (John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis) were non-Italian, signaling a globalized papacy that some may wish to continue.
Perceived Elitism:
His career as a Vatican insider and diplomat may paint him as detached from grassroots Catholicism, potentially costing votes among cardinals favoring a more pastoral figure like Zuppi or Tagle.
Conservative Resistance:
While moderate, his association with Francis’ progressive reforms (e.g., synodality, financial reforms) may draw skepticism from traditionalists like Cardinal Péter Erdő or Cardinal Robert Sarah, who command a vocal minority.
Papabile Status and Conclave Dynamics
Frontrunner Status: Parolin is consistently named among the top papabili by sources like The Independent, U.S. Catholic, and Vatican analysts. His role as Secretary of State mirrors past popes like Pius XII and Paul VI, who ascended from similar positions.
Electorate Fit: Of the 138 cardinal-electors, 110 were appointed by Francis, tilting the conclave toward candidates aligned with his vision. Parolin’s moderate support for Francis’ reforms positions him well, though he must appeal to the 28 non-Francis electors to secure the required two-thirds majority (around 92 votes).
Regional Support:
Europe: Likely to garner strong support from Italian (18 electors) and European cardinals (50 total), given his heritage and diplomatic ties.
Global South: His work in Venezuela and Africa may win votes from Latin America (24 electors) and Africa (17 electors), though Asian cardinals (15 electors) may lean toward Tagle.
Compromise Potential: In a deadlocked conclave, Parolin’s lack of ideological extremism makes him a natural compromise, unlike polarizing figures like Burke or Tagle.
Historical Precedent: Six Secretaries of State have become popes since 1700, including Pius XII (1939), reinforcing Parolin’s strong position.
Notable Achievements and Public Perception
U.S.-Cuba Thaw (2014): Parolin’s mediation led to restored diplomatic ties, earning praise from both nations and showcasing Vatican soft power.
Vatican-China Agreement (2018): Despite controversy, it marked a historic step toward normalizing relations with China, reflecting Parolin’s long-term vision for Church growth in Asia.
Ukraine Peace Efforts: Parolin has supported Vatican mediation in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, meeting with both sides and advocating for humanitarian aid, enhancing his global statesman image.
Public Image: Seen as discreet, professional, and understated, Parolin lacks the media flair of Tagle but projects stability and competence, appealing to cardinals prioritizing governance over charisma.
Potential Papal Style
If elected, Parolin would likely:
Continue Francis’ Legacy: Emphasize synodality, social justice, and global outreach, but with a more diplomatic, less pastoral tone.
Strengthen Vatican Diplomacy: Leverage his experience to mediate global conflicts and expand the Church’s influence in Asia and Africa.
Moderate Reforms: Advance inclusivity (e.g., on migration, climate) but avoid radical doctrinal shifts to maintain unity.
Italian Focus: Restore some Italian influence in the Vatican while maintaining global engagement, balancing tradition and modernity.
Conclusion
Cardinal Pietro Parolin stands out as a leading candidate to succeed Pope Francis due to his unparalleled diplomatic experience, moderate ideology, and deep Vatican connections. His role as Secretary of State, Italian heritage, and ability to bridge progressive and conservative factions make him a strong consensus choice in a diverse conclave. However, challenges like the Vatican-China deal, limited pastoral charisma, and competition from Global South candidates (e.g., Tagle, Ambongo) could complicate his path. His election would likely signal a stable, diplomatically focused papacy, continuing Francis’ global vision with a more traditional, bureaucratic approach.
The notion of Cardinal Pietro Parolin fulfilling the legend of a pope called "Peter the Roman" stems from the controversial and oft-debated Prophecy of the Popes, a series of 112 cryptic Latin phrases attributed to Saint Malachy, a 12th-century Irish bishop. This prophecy purportedly lists the popes from Celestine II (1143) to the final pope, described as Petrus Romanus (Peter the Roman), who is said to preside over the Church during a time of great tribulation, potentially leading to the end of Rome or the Church. Below, I’ll explore whether Parolin’s election as pope could be linked to this legend, considering his name, background, and the prophecy’s context, while addressing its historical credibility and modern interpretations.
The Prophecy of the Popes and "Peter the Roman"
Origin: The Prophecy of the Popes was first published in 1595 by Arnold Wion, who claimed it came from Saint Malachy. Each phrase is a motto supposedly corresponding to a pope, often interpreted retroactively to fit their characteristics, reigns, or symbols.
Final Prophecy: The last motto, for the 112th pope, reads:
In persecutione extrema S.R.E. [Sancta Romana Ecclesia] sedebit. Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oves in multis tribulationibus, quibus transactis civitas septicollis diruetur, & Judex tremêndus judicabit populum suum. Finis. Translation: "In the extreme persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit Peter the Roman, who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations, and when these things are finished, the city of seven hills [Rome] will be destroyed, and the dreadful Judge will judge his people. The End."
Interpretation: "Peter the Roman" is seen as a pope named Peter (or symbolically linked to Peter) from Rome or Italy, leading during a period of crisis, possibly apocalyptic, with Rome’s destruction and divine judgment following.
Current Context: Pope Francis, who died on April 21, 2025 (per the scenario), is often considered the 111th pope in the sequence, making his successor the potential "Peter the Roman." However, the prophecy’s vague language allows flexible interpretations.
Cardinal Pietro Parolin and the "Peter the Roman" Connection
Cardinal Parolin’s profile invites speculation about fulfilling this prophecy due to his name and Italian origins. Here’s a breakdown of the factors that could fuel such talk:
1. Name: Pietro (Peter)
Direct Link: Parolin’s first name, Pietro, is the Italian form of Peter, matching the "Petrus" in Petrus Romanus. This is a straightforward connection, as no pope since Saint Peter (the first pope) has taken the name Peter, partly due to reverence or superstition about its significance.
Papal Name: If elected, Parolin would choose a papal name, which may or may not be Peter. Popes often select names to signal continuity (e.g., John Paul I honoring predecessors) or personal devotion. While Parolin could theoretically choose "Peter II," it’s unlikely due to tradition and the weight of being the first to reuse the name. More likely, he might choose a name like Pius, Paul, or John, common among Italian popes, which would weaken the prophecy link unless interpreted symbolically.
Symbolic Peter: Even without taking the name Peter, some might argue Parolin embodies "Peter the Roman" as a figure leading the Church (like Saint Peter) from Rome, especially given his Vatican prominence as Secretary of State.
2. Roman/Italian Heritage
Italian Roots: Born in Schiavon, Veneto, Italy, Parolin is undeniably Italian, aligning with the "Romanus" aspect, as Rome is the heart of Italy and the Catholic Church. His deep ties to the Vatican, where he has worked since 1992, further associate him with Rome, the "city of seven hills."
Vatican Role: As Secretary of State, Parolin operates from the Vatican, effectively making him a "Roman" figure in Church governance. His potential election as Bishop of Rome (the pope’s primary title) would cement this connection.
Historical Context: The last Italian pope was John Paul I (1978), and Parolin’s Italian background could be seen as a return to Rome’s traditional leadership, resonating with the prophecy’s imagery.
3. Context of "Persecution" and "Tribulations"
Global Challenges: The prophecy mentions "extreme persecution" and "many tribulations." In 2025, the Church faces issues like declining membership in the West, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Ukraine, Middle East), and internal divisions over progressive reforms (e.g., same-sex blessings, synodality). Parolin’s diplomatic experience, including mediation in Ukraine and the Vatican-China deal, positions him to lead during such crises, fitting the prophecy’s narrative.
Church Polarization: Conservative criticism of Francis’ reforms (e.g., from Cardinals Burke or Sarah) and progressive pushes (e.g., by Tagle or Zuppi) create a fraught environment. Parolin’s moderate stance could be seen as "pasturing sheep" amid these internal "tribulations."
Apocalyptic Interpretations: Some fringe groups might link global crises (climate change, wars) to the prophecy’s apocalyptic tone, viewing Parolin’s leadership as the prelude to Rome’s "destruction" (literal or metaphorical, e.g., loss of influence).
Would There Be Talk?
Yes, there would likely be significant talk among certain groups about Parolin fulfilling the "Peter the Roman" prophecy, particularly if he were elected pope, for the following reasons:
Name and Origin Match: The combination of "Pietro" and his Italian/Roman ties is too striking to ignore, especially for prophecy enthusiasts, Catholic traditionalists, or apocalyptic commentators on platforms like X.
Media and Public Interest: Secular and Catholic media (e.g., Reuters, Catholic Herald) often highlight the Prophecy of the Popes during papal transitions due to its mystique. Parolin’s name would fuel headlines like “Is the New Pope Peter the Roman?” even if speculative.
Online Speculation: X posts and web discussions, especially among conspiracy theorists or prophecy-focused groups, would amplify the connection, citing Parolin’s name, Vatican role, and global crises. For example, posts might reference Malachy’s prophecy alongside Parolin’s China deal or Ukraine efforts as signs of "tribulations."
Catholic Traditionalists: Groups skeptical of Francis’ progressive reforms might frame Parolin as a stabilizing "Peter" figure, either positively (restoring tradition) or negatively (leading to prophesied ruin), depending on their view of his moderation.
Popular Culture: The prophecy has been popularized by books like The Last Pope by Robert Howells and media coverage during Benedict XVI’s resignation (2013). Parolin’s election would revive such narratives, especially among those drawn to eschatological themes.
However, the extent and seriousness of this talk would vary:
Mainstream Catholic Response: The Vatican and most theologians dismiss the prophecy as a 16th-century forgery (see below), so official Church channels would likely ignore or downplay connections to Parolin. Progressive and moderate Catholics would focus on his policies, not prophecy.
Skeptical Voices: Secular media and academics would treat the link as a curiosity, noting the prophecy’s dubious origins and the vagueness of its phrases, which can be retrofitted to any pope.
Fringe Enthusiasm: Apocalyptic websites, YouTube channels, and some traditionalist Catholic blogs would likely generate the most fervor, potentially exaggerating Parolin’s role in end-times scenarios.
Historical Credibility of the Prophecy
To assess whether Parolin’s link to "Peter the Roman" holds weight, it’s crucial to consider the prophecy’s questionable authenticity:
Doubts of Authenticity:
Scholars, including Vatican historians, widely view the Prophecy of the Popes as a forgery, likely created around 1590 to influence the conclave that elected Gregory XIV. The mottos are accurate for popes before 1595 but vague and inconsistent afterward.
The text’s attribution to Saint Malachy is unsupported by contemporary records; it surfaced 400 years after his death.
Vague Mottos: The phrases (e.g., Lumen in Caelo for Leo XIII, linked to his coat of arms) are ambiguous, allowing retroactive interpretations to fit any pope. For example, John Paul II’s motto (De Labore Solis) was tied to his Polish origins or global travels, showing how flexible the prophecy is.
Parolin’s Fit: While Parolin’s name and Italian roots align with Petrus Romanus, the prophecy’s final phrase is so broad (persecution, tribulations, Rome’s fall) that it could apply to any pope in a turbulent era, reducing its specificity.
Counterarguments to the Connection
Papal Name Choice: If Parolin chooses a name other than Peter (e.g., Pius XIII, Paul VII), the prophecy link weakens, as "Peter the Roman" is often taken literally. Symbolic interpretations (Peter as any pope) are less compelling to literalists.
Non-Apocalyptic Papacy: Parolin’s diplomatic, moderate style suggests a pragmatic papacy, not one tied to catastrophic or apocalyptic events. His focus on dialogue (e.g., with China) contrasts with the prophecy’s dire tone of Rome’s destruction.
Prophecy’s Disrepute: The Catholic Church officially disregards the prophecy, and Parolin, a canon lawyer and Vatican insider, would likely avoid engaging with it, limiting its influence in serious conclave discussions.
Competing Candidates: Other papabili, like Tagle or Zuppi, lack the "Peter" or "Roman" connection, so talk of the prophecy would be unique to Parolin but not necessarily decisive in his favor.
Conclusion
If Cardinal Pietro Parolin were elected pope, there would undoubtedly be talk, particularly among prophecy enthusiasts, traditionalist Catholics, and online commentators, about him fulfilling the "Peter the Roman" legend due to his name (Pietro), Italian origins, and Vatican role. This speculation would be amplified by media, X posts, and apocalyptic circles, especially given the prophecy’s dramatic imagery of tribulation and Rome’s fall, which could be tied to 2025’s global and Church challenges. However, the Prophecy of the Popes is widely discredited as a historical forgery, and mainstream Catholics, including Parolin himself, would likely dismiss such talk as speculative. The connection hinges on his name and heritage but weakens if he avoids the papal name Peter or leads a non-apocalyptic papacy. While the legend would generate buzz, it would not significantly influence the conclave or Parolin’s papacy among serious Church leaders.
Comments